randy myers of old river ,texas thought on 11/20/2005 that this photo was superb and added the following:
"i have stood in the same place a dozen times and taken the same picture with less quality camera but you took a great shot" 6575

Bruce Wilson of Provo, Utah thought on 2/26/2005 that this photo was displayed properly and added the following:
"Shadow. This is a north-facing panel in Buckhorn Wash, and rarely sees sunlight. Exposure and contrast were set by my digital camera. I have shot this with a 4x5 on Velvia at http://wilson.dynu.net/photo.asp?Photo_ID=6942" 7568

Jennifer Savage thought on 2/1/2005 that this photo was totally cool, dude and added the following:
"Your camera is really sexy and the tripod comes in 2nd Thanks you have a wonderful site " 9735

Bruce Wilson of Provo, Utah thought on 2/23/2004 that this photo was displayed properly and added the following:
"This is shot through a Cokin blue/yellow polarizer. I was just holding it in front of the lens as best I could, but wasn't aligned very well. In the end I liked the effect, so left it full-frame. Sort of an unintentional vignette, much like the very early field cameras that used lenses with small image circles. I've tried printing similar shots, but always come back to this one." 6342

Lauren Anderson of Ogden, UT thought on 5/22/2003 that this photo was totally cool, dude and added the following:
"Absolutely gorgeous! Everything definitely came together in this one." 5803

Cemal Ekin of Rhode Island thought on 11/24/2002 that this photo was superb and added the following:
"Wonderful rendition of nature. Excellent colors just enough saturation. You do excellent work. I think I remember your work from my PhotoSig days. Did you have a wonderful barn photo taken with a large format camera? Cemal" 5803

Cemal Ekin of Rhode Island thought on 11/24/2002 that this photo was displayed properly and added the following:
"I saw Byrce Canyon for the first time last December. It took my breath away. Then, again in May and I was blown away one more time. Although I came close to seeing the sentinel, I could not go down far enough to see it. Thank you for sharing this extremely good photograph with us all. This is probably better than what I would ahve seen on that cloudy day. I may take another trip there since my doughter and son-in-law are in SLC. You live in a wonderful country there. Regards, Cemal" 6263

Theo Jacobs of The Netherlands (highest hill: 340 meter) thought on 3/14/2002 that this photo was superb and added the following:
"Hello Bruce, Following a link from the PhotoSig site I came on your site and enjoyed it very much. This, however, is a real masterpiece! One of the best photo's I've seen in months, especially the 'big' version. One small point though: the big version is lacking a bit in sharpness, I found that sharpening it makes it even more impressive, uncovering much more detail. Do you mind if I use it as my desktop? (Well, as a matter of fact I've already tried it and it looks great on my Iiyama 21 inch)" 6026

jack gilbert of Toronto thought on 3/13/2002 that this photo was superb and added the following:
"I love photographing God's creations, the flowers.I wonder why you have not decided to use a high end digital camera and Photoshop. This remarkable combination brought me back to photography. There is instant gratification in taking a photo ,downloading on computer,manipulating in photoshop and printing in minutes.See my flowers on www.photographybyjackgilbert.com.Having viewed many of your pics it is evident you are a superp photographer and I think you should employ this to a fuller degree in the digital world. Congratulations. JACK" 2967

Bruce Wilson thought on 4/19/2001 that this photo was 'interesting' and added the following:
"It is a macro shot (using a 25mm extension tube), and using the angle finder. Angle finders are essential for getting shots that most people don't see, because you can get your camera in odd locations (on the gorund looking up) and using the finder still see what you're shooting. Were I to do this again I's stop down a little more and keep everything in focus. Most macro photography has a depth of field problem. I think it's usually done to keep the background fuzzy. It's much better to stop down then remove the background with black velvet . With an angle finder you get sky in the background, and fuzzy sky is still sky. This shot was done on a tripod (set very low), but I had to keep the shutter speed high because the wind was blowing and moving the subject." 3310